2003 MULTISPECTRAL IMAGERY |
PROPOSAL EVALUATION |
|
|
|
Evaluation
Criteria |
Aeromap |
i-cubed |
Radarsat International |
Experience and Qualifications of
the Firm (0-30 points) Possible: 150 Points (5 evaluators) |
|
|
|
138 |
120 |
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key Project Staff and
Sub-consultants (0-10 points)
Possible: 50 Points |
|
|
|
45 |
37 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available Resources/Location (0-5
points)
Possible: 25 Points |
|
|
|
23 |
16 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Methodology/Approach (Work Plan)
(0-20 points) Possible: 100 Points |
|
|
|
90 |
72 |
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractor
Location (Work Plan) (0-5 points) Possible:
25 Points |
|
|
|
24 |
12 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost (0-30 points)
Possible: 150 Points)
|
|
|
|
129 |
118.5 |
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
POINTS (Possible: 500 Points) |
426 |
359.5 |
386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RANKING: |
|
|
|
1. Aeromap |
|
|
|
2. Radarsat International |
|
|
|
3. I-cubed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|